54 vs 64

This is what we do.
Post Reply
bjfemtp
B Poster
B Poster
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 9:47 am
Location: CenCal

54 vs 64

Post by bjfemtp »

What are the main differences advantages and disadvantages between the anschutz model 64 and the 54 in a silohuette rifle. I'm sorry for my ignorance I'm just trying to put all the pieces together. :D
User avatar
Bob259
Uber Master Poster
Uber Master Poster
Posts: 4337
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:16 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: 54 vs 64

Post by Bob259 »

54, stronger action and faster lock time then the 64
F Troop - Southwest Outpost

Proud Member of the Ram Slammers US Division (Two Bob)
User avatar
BCloninger
Master Poster
Master Poster
Posts: 1331
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:22 am
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas

Re: 54 vs 64

Post by BCloninger »

Also, the 54 has a better trigger although a little tinkering. first and foremost a lighter spring, produces a much improved trigger in the 64. Weatherby wrapped their version of the 64 in a beautiful, ergonomic stock with a bargain price.

Both actions are very accurate, so you really can't go wrong.
"You are never too old to set another goal or to dream a new dream."
- C.S. Lewis
sgrayner
B Poster
B Poster
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:54 pm

Re: 54 vs 64

Post by sgrayner »

Trigger comparisons are more complicated than just "you get a better trigger on a 54 vs 64." Yes, looking at typical silhouette rifles, if you compare a single stage 5092 trigger from a 64-action 1416DKL and a two-stage 5109 trigger from a 54-action 1712, the 5109 wins hands down. On the other hand, my 64 MPR with a two-stage 5098 trigger is just as nice or nicer than my 5109 trigger. Let's leave triggers out of a comparison.

Recent Anschutz manufacturing anomalies are something to consider if one is contemplating purchase of a new 64-action rifle. Over a year ago the top of the receiver was changed from a "dimpled" surface
Image

to a "scalloped" surface
Image

The new receiver top has bumps that make zeroing a scope problematic. Typically, the bumps are higher in the front section and the scope points too far upward to zero. Rimfire Technologies and others have solutions, but a new 64-action buyer has to be aware that Anschutz engineering and manufacturing isn't what it used to be. You're going to have issues with their low-end models.

Steve
mj30wilson
Unclassified Poster
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:38 pm

Re: 54 vs 64

Post by mj30wilson »

What do you mean when you say lower end 64 actions? What models are questionable?
sgrayner
B Poster
B Poster
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:54 pm

Re: 54 vs 64

Post by sgrayner »

When I say you're going to have issues with their lower end models, I was referring to all their 64 actioned rifles with the new "scallops". The issue is the deformed metal on top of the receiver, these "bumps" on the new scallops. This problem can be overcome and the 64 actioned rifles are first-rate after one obtains a base mount that bridges the bumps. DIP http://www.diproductsinc.com/Products.aspx?CAT=3599 and others are aware of the bumps and sell mounts that attach to just the edges of the dovetail and have enough clearance on the bottom of the piece to clear the bumps.

Which models are affected? My 64 MPR had a scalloped receiver and I've seen other folk's 1416s with them. I've heard of problems also on the 64 S benchrest model. I have not heard of or seen a Weatherby XXII with a scalloped receiver, but I expect that will happen in time.

Steve
mj30wilson
Unclassified Poster
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:38 pm

Re: 54 vs 64

Post by mj30wilson »

My Weatherby has the dimples and I bought it last year. The only part I dislike is the trigger on the weatherby. It has a mile of take up on it. The pull weight is adjustable and once you get to that point it is a nice break but initial travel feels like a 1/4 inch or more.
Post Reply