Pharr stock question

This is what we do.
Post Reply
old sparky
B Poster
B Poster
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:19 pm
Location: Arizona

Pharr stock question

Post by old sparky »

How much higher is the check piece on the Pharr compared to a 1712?
thanks, Jim
Jerry G
Uber Master Poster
Uber Master Poster
Posts: 2746
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Casa Grande, AZ

Re: Pharr stock question

Post by Jerry G »

I don't think it is much higher but.......... it feels so much different. The Pharr stock and WA wonder's stock are real close to the same. How bout that new title Steve? Like it?
old sparky
B Poster
B Poster
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:19 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Pharr stock question

Post by old sparky »

Thanks for the help. I have shot a couple and like the fit of the stock but what I didnt look at is the comb height in relationship with the bore. The reason I ask is in my quest for rings I purchased a set that are a little to high for me now with my 1712 set up. The maker of the rings told me they would probably be to tall. But as usual I didnt listen.thanks, Sparky


Whats this mean?
Jerry G wrote: How bout that new title Steve? Like it?
Hawk-1
A Poster
A Poster
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Pharr stock question

Post by Hawk-1 »

Old Sparky, I measured both stocks using a dowl rod inserted. The angle of the mcmillian is angled, and with a little movement the figures varied between .5 and .6. Not a great amount. The difference was with the amount of extra on the cheek piece. Another half inch there is where the "feel" seems to come in for me. Hope this helps. david
Post Reply