New rifle decisions.
-
- Unclassified Poster
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2022 10:52 am
New rifle decisions.
If you were looking to add a new SB rifle and money wasn’t the greatest of concern what would you buy?
I’m currently debating between:
1: buy an anschutz 1712/1710 knowing I will also buy an aftermarket stock
2: go full custom Vudoo or 2500x
Any thoughts are appreciated.
I’m currently debating between:
1: buy an anschutz 1712/1710 knowing I will also buy an aftermarket stock
2: go full custom Vudoo or 2500x
Any thoughts are appreciated.
- Merlin
- AAA Poster
- Posts: 793
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:56 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
Re: New rifle decisions.
If you go custom action and are OK with the single shot get the Trident rather than the 2500X. Bolt lift won't hit your rail or scope rings as easily.
Just my thoughts.
Just my thoughts.
"Only God can judge me." Merlin
"Merlin..Your'e a rimfire whore." God
NRA Lever Action Silhouette - You get more clang for your bang with lever action silhouette.....
TSRA Lifer
NRA Patriot Patron Lifer
"Merlin..Your'e a rimfire whore." God
NRA Lever Action Silhouette - You get more clang for your bang with lever action silhouette.....
TSRA Lifer
NRA Patriot Patron Lifer
-
- AA Poster
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 7:43 am
- Location: Amarillo,Texas
Re: New rifle decisions.
A 1761 action is worth considering. Reminds me of a refined CZ457 including easy pull and swap barrels. The single shot version used on 3P rifles lacks the magazine placed perfectly in the way featured on the sporters.
Wayne Byers
-
- AAA Poster
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:10 pm
- Location: Festus, MO
Re: New rifle decisions.
FWIW - I just bought a brand new 1712.
It is having serious problems feeding from the factory supplied magazine. It is majorly frustrating for a brand new $2200+ rifle to not feed properly from its own factory magazine.
1761 is supposed to be an improvement on the magazine design, but the 1761 model is ugly, and I'm not convinced that the magazine placement on 1761 lends itself to a good silhouette hold.
Steve.
It is having serious problems feeding from the factory supplied magazine. It is majorly frustrating for a brand new $2200+ rifle to not feed properly from its own factory magazine.
1761 is supposed to be an improvement on the magazine design, but the 1761 model is ugly, and I'm not convinced that the magazine placement on 1761 lends itself to a good silhouette hold.
Steve.
-
- AA Poster
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:21 pm
- Location: NW Pa.
Re: New rifle decisions.
Tikka T1X 20” barrel.
- acorneau
- AAA Poster
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 12:12 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: New rifle decisions.
That is unfortunate and not acceptable. It may be just the magazine or it could be something with the rifle itself.Jetmugg wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:55 pm FWIW - I just bought a brand new 1712.
It is having serious problems feeding from the factory supplied magazine. It is majorly frustrating for a brand new $2200+ rifle to not feed properly from its own factory magazine.
If I were you I would contact Anschutz North America to initiate a repair/ servicing if you can’t figure out the problem on your own.
Best of luck.
Allen Corneau
-
- AAA Poster
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:10 pm
- Location: Festus, MO
Re: New rifle decisions.
I understand and agree. The rifle is boxed and ready to return from my local dealer to Anschutz North America. This is my recent experience. I previously owned a different 1712 that exhibited no issues other than the well-known weak ejection which would sometimes result in empty cases falling back into the loading / ejection port.
The 1761 looks interesting to me. I haven't held one, and wonder what the hold would be like with the magazine extending in front of the trigger guard as it does. AFAIK, it is still not legal to support one's hand on the bottom of a magazine in silhouette matches. That looks like it might be a problem for the 1761 design.
Steve.
The 1761 looks interesting to me. I haven't held one, and wonder what the hold would be like with the magazine extending in front of the trigger guard as it does. AFAIK, it is still not legal to support one's hand on the bottom of a magazine in silhouette matches. That looks like it might be a problem for the 1761 design.
Steve.
-
- AA Poster
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 7:43 am
- Location: Amarillo,Texas
Re: New rifle decisions.
Depending on your hold the magazine very well may be exactly in the way on the repeater. I own a 1761 single shot 3 position target rifle, no magazine in the way. I have not done any research for parts but the difference between the single shot and repeater seems to be plastic filler in what would be the magazine cut on the receiver. Extraction and lockup are robust. Lock-time very fast. There is very little scope base real estate on the action. I used extended rings to mount a scope to my liking for prone matches. If not for my preference for a magazine fed repeater I would not hesitate to build a Smallbore rifle on the 1761. Other point of consideration, barrel profile options and availability. Although the barrels are easy to swap (much like a CZ 457) several years ago they appeared very hard to find. Maybe a few more years has changed that.
Wayne Byers