What kind of high rings?

SqHunter · Post by **SqHunter** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:30 pm

I am trying to get a more relaxed head position with my SA 54, went from Warnes to High Burris Signitures but they do not seem stable. Zero changed twice during one practice session, pretty much every time I put the rifle down it would shift.

I would like a set of extra high rings bases, would prefer aluminum to save weight. Correspondance with Marv (metalhead) has been unsuccessful. Are there alternatives? Is there any one who will make such a thing?

Thanks,

Rex

jjp · Post by **jjp** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:40 pm

I'm sure he will reply when he gets online. You won't be sorry with his. You are welcome to shoot mine next month if you would like to try them out.

SqHunter · Post by **SqHunter** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:55 pm

Thanks Jason, I would like to at least hold your rifle to see if that is the correct height.

Marv responded, he is just not making any more. Out of luck on that one.

So the search continues.

Boyd L. · Post by **Boyd L.** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:58 pm

What I use is a standard BKL rings on a BKL riser block. Gives a bit more height than BKL high rings.

SqHunter · Post by **SqHunter** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:06 pm

I understand that BKL is out of business too. Is this true? If not, are those the "257s" you are talking about?

Thanks,

Rex

Boyd L. · Post by **Boyd L.** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:08 pm

SqHunter wrote:I understand that BKL is out of business too. Is this true? If not, are those the "257s" you are talking about?

Thanks,

Rex

No, they're still in business. Go to bkltech.com. You'll see the listing for the 257 rings and riser blocks (sorry, I don't remember the model #).

SqHunter · Post by **SqHunter** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:15 pm

Thanks, I will do that.

Are there any others made along the lines of the Marv Pearson set?

Boyd L. · Post by **Boyd L.** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:18 pm

http://www.bkltech.com/BKL_0_6_inch_Lon ... kl-180.htm

Try this link.

jjp · Post by **jjp** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:21 pm

Man, I'm glad I got a set of his. I hope he keeps making them. I still want another set.

SqHunter · Post by **SqHunter** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:23 pm

Jason, I guess that means I can't trade you out of yours?

Just kidding.

jjp · Post by **jjp** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:55 pm

SqHunter wrote:Jason, I guess that means I can't trade you out of yours? Just kidding.

Now I have to take really good care of them.

They are very nice. I'm proud to own a set. Maybe things will work out and Mr. Pearson will be able to make more.

Trent · Post by **Trent** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:03 pm

SqHunter wrote:I am trying to get a more relaxed head position with my SA 54, went from Warnes to High Burris Signitures but they do not seem stable. Zero changed twice during one practice session, pretty much every time I put the rifle down it would shift.

I would like a set of extra high rings bases, would prefer aluminum to save weight. Correspondance with Marv (metalhead) has been unsuccessful. Are there alternatives? Is there any one who will make such a thing?

Thanks,

Rex

If your Burris rings are moving then something is wrong. I would suspect that that the screws are not torqued properly. Is the tube loose in the rings, or are you saying that the bases are moving on the attachment point of the receiver? Burris Signature rings hold up to centerfire recoil. There should be no reason that they are not holding true on a rimfire.

Jason · Post by **Jason** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:13 pm

I've used the Burris Signature rings on a 6.5lb 270 Winchester with scorching hot loads with no change in zero over the course of several sessions. I agree that there's something wrong with the setup if they're moving on you.

jbolt · Post by **jbolt** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:32 pm

I had trouble with my Burris signature dovetail rings where the locking nut would bind on the clamp and not fully tighten against the dovetail. Drove me nuts until I figured it out.

SqHunter · Post by **SqHunter** » Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:35 am

Sorry, I should be more specific.

I have used the Signitures in Redfield and Weaver type on many firearms without incident, but I am trying the "22 and Air Rifle" version for the grooved reciever. They are torgued as tight as I can turn the screw, and every time I lay the rifle down the scope gets shifted. I have used this scope on this rifle in other mounts for years without issue, so to me that means the rings are the culprit.

To be honest, they are very high and I would think that means they would be more susceptible to leverage and pressure to the side. They also are obviously generic in terms of action curvature, so they do not sit well on top of the action. Lots of space there. I purchased them to experiment with head position. I would prefer a stronger base ring combination, but so far that has not allowed enough leeway for scope position. Scopes seem to always be set as far back in the rings as possible, with the turret housing butting up agains the rear ring.

So... that is why I am looking for a different, hopefully more durable system. Wish Marv still made rings.

What kind of high rings?

What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?

Re: What kind of high rings?