Page 2 of 3
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:19 am
by dustinflint
Shane,
If you want to enjoy this game you are REALLY going to have to look into getting a decent rifle! ;)
Dustin
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:34 am
by Bob259
Shane,
Looks like it will take you to much time to make a decision on which one to shoot... I'll take some off your hands so you have more time to shoot

Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:09 pm
by steveyacht
Gorgeous Collection.
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:58 pm
by JOSEPHVILLE GUN
dustinflint wrote:Shane,
If you want to enjoy this game you are REALLY going to have to look into getting a decent rifle! ;)
Dustin
yeah I would like to have a 1712 miestergrade cant afford it yet.
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:04 am
by JOSEPHVILLE GUN
thanks for the kind words
looking forward to the feb5th match
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:37 am
by JDBraddy
Awesome gun porn! We have similar tastes, but you've got a bigger collection!
BRNO Mod-2E 1992.
CZ 452 Silhouette 2006.
Erik Johnson built Rem-37 with Redfield Olympic sights once owned by John Sullivan who I believe took the nationals at Perry back in the early 50's with it, but don't know how to look up the records.1948.
Anschutz 1408 ISU rifle, 1966
CMP Win-52D with micro-motion trigger, 1968
BSA Martini Intl. Mk-II 1948
Voquartzen Custom Lightweight. 1998.

Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:26 am
by JOSEPHVILLE GUN
JDBraddy wrote:Awesome gun porn! We have similar tastes, but you've got a bigger collection!
BRNO Mod-2E 1992.
CZ 452 Silhouette 2006.
Erik Johnson built Rem-37 with Redfield Olympic sights once owned by John Sullivan who I believe took the nationals at Perry back in the early 50's with it, but don't know how to look up the records.1948.
Anschutz 1408 ISU rifle, 1966
CMP Win-52D with micro-motion trigger, 1968
BSA Martini Intl. Mk-II 1948
Voquartzen Custom Lightweight. 1998.

Very nice collection you have also.
shane
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:15 am
by DavidABQ
Shane,
WOW!
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:28 am
by JDBraddy
Shane, Am considering getting a lever action for cowboy silhouette, do you prefer your Marlin or your Henry and why?
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:20 am
by Innocent
JD, off the topic on this thread but my answer.
Marlin (older) as the Henry has gone to using plastic trigger/action mechanisms....and I'm old school and prefer metal. BTW they (Marlins) are 400 to 500 here in FL.
But in contrast to another question you had on another topic...fit is VERY important. What feels best for your build is much more important in all the silhouette disciplines, as 95%+ of the shooters can not even come close to holding the rifle steady enough to match the accuracy potential of the rifle from the bench.
So hold both the Henry and Marlin....and in the standard game try as many of the CZ's as you can, the 452 action is the same, the stock configuration is the biggest difference in them. But do remember stocks can be modified or changed.
Mary
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:32 am
by JOSEPHVILLE GUN
JDBraddy wrote:Shane, Am considering getting a lever action for cowboy silhouette, do you prefer your Marlin or your Henry and why?
JD,
I have not set the Marlin up side by side for a comparison to the Henry the Marlin shoots well as I remember but has an occasional failure to extract and I have not as of yet replaced the extractor. The Marlin is a 1952 model that I purchased more for my collection than as a shooter. The Henry has a very smooth action and with a little stoning and a spring change it has a decent trigger and it shoots well. I bought it to shoot. However i do believe the quality of construction is better on the old Marlin rifles and in my opinion they are the better rifle, but the new Marlins since Remington took them over and moved the factory have had some problems. My experience has been that the Remington/ Marlin quality control is non existent so be careful.Henry does stand behind there rifles and I think you will have a better chance of getting a problem freee new rifle from them rather than Marlin. I hope this helps you.
shane
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:19 am
by JOSEPHVILLE GUN
I am now setting up the Marlin also i have a tang sight ordered for it. Will let you know how it does.
shane
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:40 pm
by Jason
I would love to see the pictures of it once you have it outfitted with the new sights.

Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:36 am
by JOSEPHVILLE GUN
Jason wrote:I would love to see the pictures of it once you have it outfitted with the new sights.

I will post them once I get the sights in they are on order. I took the scope off and plugged the holes and worked on the ejection issue the rifle has a good trigger and seems to shoot well. We will see.
Shane
i
Re: Newbie to Steelchickens but not rimfire photo heavy
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:12 pm
by chuckjordan2
Interesting collection Shane. Krico?