A Rookie's Thoughts on Ammo
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:14 am
I had a great time over about two weeks doing my ammo testing. It was a zen-like experience, spending time with my rifle and getting to know her as we fiddled with various combinations looking for what would work best, would work best for the price, and what just plain wouldn't do.
I got off to a slow start when I discovered that one of bases left on the rifle by the previous owner was not perfectly aligned with the axis of the bore / receiver. Investigation showed it to be a fault with the imprecise drilling and tapping of the holes in the receiver. The result was that sighting in the scope found it all the way to one extreme of its windage adjustment. Since I had already decided upon Burris rings for the mounting, it later was easily 'fixed' with application of the proper ring inserts... which, unfortunately, I did not bring to that initial session. Bummer-dess. So I shot a few groups at 50 yards, just to be shooting, then took her home.
Next session I brought along all the kit, including the inserts for the Burris rings, and played with various combinations of the inserts until I found the one that brought the scope closest to the center of its windage ajdustment when sighted in at 77 meters. Done with that, I resighted her for 100 yards then spent several hours shooting holes in paper in what will likely be only one stage in my testing of ammo.
In my first session, where I shot a few groups at 50 yards, I had already observed that the off-the-shelf stuff from WalMart was not in the running (groups of 1.5" or so at 50 yards just didn't seem promising!), so it wasn't tested for group size at 100 yards. Some of the mid-price stuff from the local gun store had shown promise at 50 yards but was clearly not up to the standards of the pricey stuff - it didn't get tested in the 100 yard session but will get another go later on when I start working out "best for the price."
Of the ammo that was tested, I was pleased to see that most of them grouped under 1". Given the price of some of them, I guess I shouldn't have been surprised with that. What was surprising was that some of the more affordable stuff performed as well as some of real expensive stuff, making them real bargains as long as I can keep my wobble zone on the target. My future sessions will be aimed at uncovering more of those gems.
The results, showing the average size of 5 groups with each ammo:
Next, being the geek that I am, I whipped out my calculator and tried to come up with some way to measure the cost of accuracy. Or, more accurately
, to rank the "value" of each ammo based on its cost compared to its performance, in order to identify the best option for practice ammo. The results are:
I shot some Fiocchi but it is not included because the results at 100 yards were out of whack with what I expected based on its performance at 50 yards. It might be the ammo, but I suspect some other cause so will give it a another go later on just to make sure.
CCI's Green Tag showed lots of promise at 50 yards but I haven't tried it at 100 yards yet. I expect it will be similar to the Federal 711B. I've also picked up some Federal 719 that others tell me is worth trying.
The usual caveats to this unscientific comparison apply: YMMV, IMHO, just my 2d, etc, etc.
I got off to a slow start when I discovered that one of bases left on the rifle by the previous owner was not perfectly aligned with the axis of the bore / receiver. Investigation showed it to be a fault with the imprecise drilling and tapping of the holes in the receiver. The result was that sighting in the scope found it all the way to one extreme of its windage adjustment. Since I had already decided upon Burris rings for the mounting, it later was easily 'fixed' with application of the proper ring inserts... which, unfortunately, I did not bring to that initial session. Bummer-dess. So I shot a few groups at 50 yards, just to be shooting, then took her home.
Next session I brought along all the kit, including the inserts for the Burris rings, and played with various combinations of the inserts until I found the one that brought the scope closest to the center of its windage ajdustment when sighted in at 77 meters. Done with that, I resighted her for 100 yards then spent several hours shooting holes in paper in what will likely be only one stage in my testing of ammo.
In my first session, where I shot a few groups at 50 yards, I had already observed that the off-the-shelf stuff from WalMart was not in the running (groups of 1.5" or so at 50 yards just didn't seem promising!), so it wasn't tested for group size at 100 yards. Some of the mid-price stuff from the local gun store had shown promise at 50 yards but was clearly not up to the standards of the pricey stuff - it didn't get tested in the 100 yard session but will get another go later on when I start working out "best for the price."
Of the ammo that was tested, I was pleased to see that most of them grouped under 1". Given the price of some of them, I guess I shouldn't have been surprised with that. What was surprising was that some of the more affordable stuff performed as well as some of real expensive stuff, making them real bargains as long as I can keep my wobble zone on the target. My future sessions will be aimed at uncovering more of those gems.
The results, showing the average size of 5 groups with each ammo:
Code: Select all
Federal 711B............... 1.222"
Wolf Match Extra........... 0.919"
Eley Practice 100.......... 1.001"
Eley Silhouex.............. 0.941"
Eley Club X-tra............ 1.101"
Eley Standard.............. 0.785"
Eley Biathlon Sport........ 0.918"
Eley Biathlon EPS.......... 0.916"
Eley Match EPS............. 0.717"
Lapua L.................... 0.733"
Lapua M.................... 1.001"

Code: Select all
Eley Standard.............. 3.11
Federal 711B............... 2.73
Wolf Match Extra........... 2.72
Eley Practice 100.......... 2.50
Eley Biathlon Sport........ 2.27
Eley Silhouex.............. 2.04
Eley Club X-tra............ 1.59
Eley Biathlon EPS.......... 1.56
Lapua L.................... 1.52
Eley Match EPS............. 1.39
Lapua M.................... 1.13
CCI's Green Tag showed lots of promise at 50 yards but I haven't tried it at 100 yards yet. I expect it will be similar to the Federal 711B. I've also picked up some Federal 719 that others tell me is worth trying.
The usual caveats to this unscientific comparison apply: YMMV, IMHO, just my 2d, etc, etc.