Innocent wrote:You may want to look into Arizona's high school graduation requirements and the stats on that. There are some firearm training requirments in that state that should be looked into.

Innocent

Thanks, Innocent. I actually do believe every citizen needs basic firearm instruction unless prohibited by religious belief, but that is unlikely to happen.

Blau Bear,
On every citizen needing firearm training (safety at the very least) amen.

Mary

Innocent wrote:Now Dawg,
I figure if you can figure out how to whip a serious disease then you can figure out how to un-whip it right????

Innocent

You would think wouldn't you,.....hhhuuuummmm....I think that the solution to this problem will work also on unmastering myself.....self actualization.
Free at last, free at last.

Mary;

This is a difficult subject to discuss anywhere since so many in academia are anti-gun reactionaries while so many in the gun community are at least suspicious of anything attached to government.

But immediately past these reactionary issues are the reality that so many people, maybe most, only know guns from the distorted images in movies and television, and only associate them with crimes or the military. In their minds, anyone interested in guns is, therefore, a criminal or paramilitary. We have to do better or our sport is doomed.

- Bob

Good thing there are no academics on this board

Kitty

Now for all you smart peoples.

438 view for this thread
43 posts but only
1 post is actually about the topic.
What is the probability of that happening in this forum, 100 percent.

Carry on, I am still waiting where the next tangent is going to.

papabear wrote:Now for all you smart peoples.

438 view for this thread
43 posts but only
1 post is actually about the topic.
What is the probability of that happening in this forum, 100 percent.

Carry on, I am still waiting where the next tangent is going to.

Some times facts and statistics just ruin all the fun

papabear wrote:Now for all you smart peoples.

438 view for this thread
43 posts but only
1 post is actually about the topic.
What is the probability of that happening in this forum, 100 percent.

Carry on, I am still waiting where the next tangent is going to.

Cheese it you's guys, the forum police have fingered us. Nows we gonna have to start a new post to hide under another name. Hows about "Thermo nuclear bullet aliment

papabear wrote:Now for all you smart peoples.

438 view for this thread
43 posts but only
1 post is actually about the topic.
What is the probability of that happening in this forum, 100 percent.

Carry on, I am still waiting where the next tangent is going to.

Wait all ya want papabear aka G-Man wezz on to ya.

Now for all you smart peoples.

Papa bear, we shoot $3000.00 .22s at little representations of barnyard animals to win plastic trophies and an ocassional door prize. We spend a lot of money traveling the country to do these things...And, when we get pretty good (AAA or Master) our chances of winning said plastic trophy go waaaay down. Yet, we are delighted to do these things and cant' wait till the next match......Eccentric might be a better discriptor in this case than smart.....

Kitty

As the data suggested, Kitty isn't really an outlier, I was just measuring two distinct populations.

In other words, it's worse than I thought: For us, Kitty is normal...

'Bear your defination of normal must be a very generous one.....

Kitty

Not generous, you're just a normal example of the sub-species "River Range Rat"...

BlauBear wrote:sub-species "River Range Rat"...

Hey! Wait a minuite!....sub-species "River Range Rat"??

I resemble that remark.......